Difference between revisions of "Talk:Amazing Rocking Horse"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: Spading the damage... Intensity 35: Damage amounts-[9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18] (Appears to be 9-18. If you spot any damage types lower than 9 or higher than 18 AT INTENSITY 35 edit thi...) |
|||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Spading the damage... | Spading the damage... | ||
Intensity 35: Damage amounts-[9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18] (Appears to be 9-18. If you spot any damage types lower than 9 or higher than 18 AT INTENSITY 35 edit this page. | Intensity 35: Damage amounts-[9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18] (Appears to be 9-18. If you spot any damage types lower than 9 or higher than 18 AT INTENSITY 35 edit this page. | ||
+ | |||
+ | @CommanderMack: The rocking horse isn't causing those chat censors, that's the built in one. So I don't think it should be listed here, no? --[[User:Cowboy|Cowboy]] 11:06, 21 May 2011 (MDT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | The word filter replaces the censored words, yes, but when that happens it lets the ARH have a chance to do its chat effect, Oh, thats dirty! or whatever it says. --[[User:Commandermack|Mack]] 20:38, 21 May 2011 (MDT) |
Latest revision as of 02:38, 22 May 2011
Spading the damage... Intensity 35: Damage amounts-[9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18] (Appears to be 9-18. If you spot any damage types lower than 9 or higher than 18 AT INTENSITY 35 edit this page.
@CommanderMack: The rocking horse isn't causing those chat censors, that's the built in one. So I don't think it should be listed here, no? --Cowboy 11:06, 21 May 2011 (MDT)
The word filter replaces the censored words, yes, but when that happens it lets the ARH have a chance to do its chat effect, Oh, thats dirty! or whatever it says. --Mack 20:38, 21 May 2011 (MDT)