Difference between revisions of "Talk:Holographic pair o' dice"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "Either the formula listed is incorrect or the TP values are incorrect. The formula is listed as (1/6n)(n+1)(n+1) while the TP values shown follow the formula (n/6)(n+1)(n+2). I d...") |
m |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Either the formula listed is incorrect or the TP values are incorrect. The formula is listed as (1/6n)(n+1)(n+1) while the TP values shown follow the formula (n/6)(n+1)(n+2). I don't have a pair of dice myself to see which one is correct, but could someone with some check? | Either the formula listed is incorrect or the TP values are incorrect. The formula is listed as (1/6n)(n+1)(n+1) while the TP values shown follow the formula (n/6)(n+1)(n+2). I don't have a pair of dice myself to see which one is correct, but could someone with some check? | ||
| + | |||
| + | -Darkgamr | ||
| + | |||
| + | I tested the TP values. I got the same that are listed: 1,4,10, 20, 35, 56, 120, and then 165. | ||
| + | -Jazzy (5/10/11) | ||
| + | |||
| + | In that case it looks like there was just a typo in the formula, I got it fixed though | ||
| + | -Darkgamr | ||
Latest revision as of 21:24, 11 May 2011
Either the formula listed is incorrect or the TP values are incorrect. The formula is listed as (1/6n)(n+1)(n+1) while the TP values shown follow the formula (n/6)(n+1)(n+2). I don't have a pair of dice myself to see which one is correct, but could someone with some check?
-Darkgamr
I tested the TP values. I got the same that are listed: 1,4,10, 20, 35, 56, 120, and then 165. -Jazzy (5/10/11)
In that case it looks like there was just a typo in the formula, I got it fixed though -Darkgamr